
Timing is a lever. When you buy equipment, pay a bonus, or make an RRSP contribution changes what you can deduct and when — and the best moves are made before your year-end closes, not in the scramble afterward. Reviewing your position mid-year is what keeps those options open.
Reconciled every month, your books are filing-ready and cheaper to prepare. Rebuilt in a hurry from a shoebox of receipts, they produce a number that's wrong often enough to matter — missed credits, personal expenses left in, transfers coded as revenue. Keep bank, credit-card, and HST records current as you go.

Software reports what happened; it won't tell you what to do about it. A specialist who knows your business structure can flag changes to your instalments, the small business deduction, and your salary-versus-dividend mix while there's still time to act — before the return is filed, not after.
The point is simple: the earlier you look, the more you can change. A review done mid-year gives every decision two quarters to work — the same review in filing season is just a report on choices already made.
“A mid-year review isn't more paperwork. It's the chance to change your tax bill while you still can — deliberately, with the numbers in front of you.”
The right tools cut the manual work — automatic bank feeds, digital receipts, and built-in GST/HST tracking. Paired with a monthly review, the numbers start driving decisions instead of just piling up. We set this up and keep it running as part of every engagement.
A CRA envelope gets the same reaction from almost everyone. Your stomach drops, and then you decide to deal with it later. Both halves of that are the problem.
The panic is usually misplaced. Most letters the CRA sends are routine, automated, and narrow. They ask for one document, or question one line of your return. They are not an audit, and they do not mean anyone has decided you did something wrong.
Dealing with it later is where the actual damage happens. Almost every CRA letter carries a deadline, and the consequence of missing it is rarely a conversation. It is usually a reassessment that removes whatever you could not support, calculated as though the claim was never valid.
So the first job is not to respond. It is to work out which letter you are holding.
Quick answer: What should I do if I receive a letter from the CRA? Identify the type before you do anything else, because the response differs. A processing review or request for information asks you to support something already claimed, and normally states its own deadline. A notice of reassessment is a decision that has already been made and starts a separate, shorter clock if you disagree with it. An audit letter is a different process again. Read the letter for what it actually asks and by when, gather only what was asked for, respond in writing through the channel it specifies, and keep a copy of everything you send. The two mistakes that turn a routine review into a real problem are missing the stated deadline, and sending more than was requested. Confirm deadlines and procedures at canada.ca, because they differ by letter type and by year.
The letter itself will say, usually in the first paragraph and again in the reference line. It is worth reading twice before reacting, because the common types have different stakes and different clocks.
Confirm current deadlines, thresholds, and procedures at canada.ca before calculating or relying on any of them. They vary by letter type, by tax year, and occasionally by province.
The direct cost is the claim itself. A denied deduction becomes taxable income, and tax is assessed on it as though the claim was never made.
On top of that sits interest, which compounds daily from the original due date rather than from the date of the letter. That is why a matter left for three months is not the same matter three months later.
The indirect cost is the one people miss. A review answered well from existing records closes and ends. A review answered badly, or not at all, tends to invite the next one. The position you are in when a request arrives is largely determined before it arrives.
Received something from the CRA and not sure what it is? Book a free consultation at countmyaccount.ca. Tell us the letter type, the date on it, and the tax year it refers to. We will tell you what it actually asks, what the deadline is, and what a clean response looks like.
Usually not. The majority of CRA correspondence is automated review or a request for supporting documents on a specific line of a filed return, and it carries no implication that anything is wrong. An audit is a distinct process, generally identified as such and assigned a named contact. The letter will tell you which it is, normally in the opening paragraph and in the reference line.
The letter states its own deadline, and around 30 days is common for processing reviews. Deadlines differ by letter type and by year, so read the date on your letter rather than relying on a general figure, and confirm at canada.ca. If you cannot meet it, request an extension before it passes; asking in advance is routine, asking afterward is not.
The CRA reassesses using the information it already holds, which in practice means removing the claim you did not support. The amount becomes taxable, and interest is charged from the original due date rather than from the date of the letter. Silence is not read as disagreement, and it does not preserve your position.
Yes, through a formal objection, but it runs on its own deadline which is separate from and shorter than most people assume, and it is calculated from the date on the notice. Because the rules differ between individuals and corporations, and the calculation can depend on your filing due date, confirm the exact deadline that applies to your notice at canada.ca or with your accountant before relying on any general figure.
No. Reviews are deliberately narrow, and sending material that was not requested widens the scope and raises questions nobody had asked. Answer precisely what was asked, in writing, and keep a dated record of what you sent.
Run both at once rather than in sequence, because the letter's deadline does not pause while you reconcile. Work out what the letter specifically needs and rebuild that part first, then carry on with the wider catch-up behind it. This combination, a live deadline plus books that are months behind, is the situation that most often converts a routine letter into a material cost.